Cruise ship in crystal blue water with blue sky

Verdicts & Settlements

Featured Cases and Matters John and Jane Does 1-14 v Two Major Pharmaceutical Companies

Practice Area: Defective and Dangerous Drugs Pharmaceutical Products
Date: Jun 01, 2004
Outcome: Settled for confidential amounts in all 14 cases totaling $10,000,000
Description:
All 14 cases on behalf of individuals who took the diet drug Fen-Phen were litigated in Circuit court after recommended that Holzberg legal all Plaintiffs should opt out of pending Class Action, on our firm's advice, and file separate lawsuits. The cases settled before trial for confidential payments to each Plaintiff we represented, ranging from $350,000-$1 million, per client. We alleged that the diet drug Fen-Phen caused serious and permanent heart valve damage to our clients as a result of long-term ingestion of the drug to assist in weight loss.


S. P. v Medical Center

Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Date: Jun 25, 1994
Outcome: Jury Verdict $2,500,000
Description:
The Jury found General Surgeon and then Hospital Chief of Surgery liable for negligence during a gallbladder removal surgery- a laparoscopic cholecystectomy - by failing to properly identify the anatomy, by failing to perform an intraoperative cholangiogram, which with the injection of a radioactive dye would have provided a "road map" to the common bile duct, resulting in a complete dissection of the duct. This breach of the standard of care was not recognized by the doctor during surgery and our client was closed with bile leaking into the abdominal cavity and adjacent organs including the liver. Ultimately she suffered from complications associated with liver damage and caused by a delay in recognizing the duct dissection, leading to likely lifelong infections, digestive difficulties and pain, and suffering.


Settlement - Cruise Ship Grounding

Settlement of 22 passenger claims for survivors of the grounding and near sinking of the Major Cruise Line Ship for a confidential amount reflecting an average settlement 6 times the companies initial offers.


J.D. v Major Cruise Line

On the eve of trial, we settled this case from $1,050,000 on behalf of badly injured Indian seaman, who worked on a large cruise ship for over 17 years rising to the level of chief bartender. After failing to diagnose an intestinal tumor on the ship he was left in a hospital in Aruba for over 30 days where he had multiple unsuccessful operations including several reversals of colostomy’s following exploratory surgeries never finding the actual tumor. He spent another five months in Miami Florida Hospital where he almost died and was given last rites. J.D finally returned to his home in Goa, India where with the settlement proceeds, he was able to retire as due to his injuries and significant scarring and pain he was no longer able to work the cruise ship industry.


R.N. v Chiropractor

Florida chiropractor performed a dangerous manipulation under anesthesia to our client's cervical spine causing an embolic stroke with significant consequences to our client who is a 54-year-old successful businessman. This procedure, MUA, is illegal in Canada and other parts of the world as it causes unreasonable risks of harm to the spinal cord and brain of patients who undergo the procedure. We are able to demonstrate that as a result of over-manipulation of the neck during a many many our procedure where client was under anesthesia and unaware of what was happening to them, the over-manipulation by the chiropractor caused a severing of a vertebral artery causing a shower of blood to the brain – an embolic stroke which resulted in significant traumatic brain damage. Before trial, we were able to settle this case on behalf of her deserving client for $785,000.


K.D. v Rental Car Company

Practice Area: Brain Injury
Outcome: Verdict - $769,000
Description:
We sued a rental car company for negligence in their operation of an airport bus transporting K.D, an airplane flight and ground mechanic. After establishing that K.D. suffers traumatic closed head injuries and a concussion upon striking his head inside the bus on a metal support post behind the front passenger seat, we won a hard-fought jury verdict, after 5 days of trial for $769,000 including approximately $550,000 in projected future wage loss. The verdict was paid in full by the rental car company after past trial motions were denied by the court. We also successfully obtained a $100,000 workers compensation award for K.D. with the help or co-counsel attorneys with whom we regularly work to obtain full benefits for our clients who were injured on the job.


J.P. and W.P. v C.C and R.C.

Practice Area: Slip and Fall Accident
Date: Feb 06, 2006
Outcome: Settlement for $750,000
Description:
J.P. tripped over a vacuum cleaner in her sisters’ home when the family dog lunged at her baring its teeth in an aggressive manner. She suffered a distal radial fracture of her dominant wrist, which over 4-6 weeks developed into RSD/CRPS I (Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy n/k/a Comprehensive Regional Pain Syndrome). The defendant's insurance carrier covered the defendants C.C. home with a $300,000 policy with a $25,000 dog attack limitation. Holzberg Legal took the position that a failure to pay the $25,000 limit within 30 days of demand was bad faith. When the insurance carrier, through its outside adjustment company, offered the 25k limits after 72 days, we rejected the offer filed suit and prepared for trial. At mediation 1 month before trial, the insurance carrier acknowledged the problems in failing to timely tender, paid $750,000 to settle this and any future Bad Faith action. Had the insurance carrier delivered a check for $25,000 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF OUR INITIAL DEMAND THEIR EXPOSURE WOULD HAVE BEEN LIMITED TO THAT AMOUNT AND WOULD HAVE SAVED $725,000.


I.G. v Apartment Complex

Our client a 37-year-old husband and father, who worked in law enforcement, slipped and fell on wet flyers and other papers that an apartment complex allowed to be distributed near the mailboxes of our client apartment. When the breezeway with the mailboxes relocated, very common in Miami Florida, the flyers from local restaurants and other businesses would become wet and remain on the floor. Our client unfortunately slipped and fell while carrying his small child in his arms. While instinctively protecting her during the fall he struck his head hard on the wet pavement, resulting in mild traumatic brain injuries. Holzberg Legal was able to negotiate a settlement for $475,000 before trial for this deserving client.


J.D. v Shopping Mall

After several years of litigation, we reached a $300,000 settlement for a 32-year-old mother and wife who slipped and fell at this well-known Boca Raton shopping mall due to a leaking roof causing water to puddle on white marble in the center of the mall. Our clients suffered mild) injuries cognitive changes in memory loss and recurrent headaches. Due to our discovery efforts which establish that the mall had waited for more than the estimated useful life of the roof and slowly replaced in stages resulting in excessive water leakage and puddling at times we were able to prove negligence on the part of the shopping center and its management company and settled the case on behalf of our well-deserved client.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
I was extremely pleased with the result of this offices' work. Their knowledge of the situation brought me to discover that I had further medical issues. They took time to explain what needed to be done at each step and what the result would be. I am extremely pleased with the outcome. Martha
★★★★★
When you want someone to take on the big guys, Holzberg Legal is who I had and would want in the fight. The big corporations have big and powerful legal teams fighting you all the way. You want the hard working staff and sharp legal minds and advice on your side. It is a fight that is stacked against you. Get the best. David
★★★★★
Mr. Glenn Holzberg did an excellent job for my brother, Querobino, Mr. Holzberg was very active in the lawsuit and was determined to either go to trial or get my brother a settlement. His persistence and patience proved to be in our best interest. I would have no second thoughts in recommending Glenn in other similar litigations. Lavinia